The author gave Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Fable 5 the same prompt, asking them to generate a social-app profile card for a creator and comparing the results.
The original prompt required designing and building a profile card within a fixed 500×500-pixel square frame, including a portrait, name, bio, follower information, and a follow button. The model could decide the visual design and detailed content.
The author considered Fable 5's result clearly worse and later added in the comments that Sol won, but Grok came very close. The comments also pointed out that Fable has no image-generation capability, creating a capability mismatch in the comparison.
This is a same-prompt comparison of visual and front-end experience. The results suggest that one round of Grok 4.6 generation can already approach a more expensive model's quality. However, because image-generation capabilities were not equivalent and there was no standardized scoring rubric, the result cannot be generalized into a comprehensive ranking of design capabilities.
Grok 4.6
