TypingMind said it gave the same “traditional Chinese paper-cut-style animation” prompt to Grok 4.6, GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, and Qwen 3.8 Max to compare the generated results. The post included a video and, in follow-up replies, provided the complete prompt and links for comparing the models: https://cloud.typingmind.com/share/0bc76cfe-c0a3-4144-a042-eee5d845ac63
The comments included the following views:
One user ranked Grok 4.6 third among the four models, believing that Sol had better colors and Opus had better visual results.
Another user thought the results were cool overall, with particular interest in what a 500K context means for agents.
The post itself did not provide structured scores, so it can only serve as a visual sample under the same prompt and in the same scenario, not as a general ranking of visual capabilities.
This X test shows that Grok 4.6 can take part in side-by-side comparisons for interactive visual/front-end projects, but the result depends heavily on the prompt, generation pipeline, and evaluation criteria. When using it, save the complete prompt, model configuration, and outputs instead of drawing conclusions from video screenshots alone.
Grok 4.6
