A comparison of the playable browser games produced by GLM 5.3, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Opus 5 under the same /design prompt; Sol's interface was good, but the game was unplayable, and it cost more than the other two.
The following is the visible body text extracted during this visit. It includes page navigation, machine translation, advertising, comments, and other page elements; verify against the original link before citing it.
To view keyboard shortcuts, press the question mark View keyboard shortcuts Home Explore Notifications Chat Grok Premium History Creator Studio Articles Profile More Post 潦草学者 Scholar.L @liaocaoxuezhe Post See new posts Conversation noclipepe @noclipepe Show translation GLM 5.3 just outplayed GPT-5.6 Sol at its own game — for 20× less.
Соmmand Соde tested all three with the same /design prompt.
GLM 5.3: $0.016 · playable GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.32 · nice UI, broken game Opus 5: $0.37 · best Subway Surfers-style clone
GLM wasn’t the best overall.
But it made GPT’s result look very expensive. 0:37 Quote noclipepe @noclipepe · Aug 14 Article GPT vs Qwen vs Grok vs Opus: The Epic One-Shot Showdown Four AI Models, Three One-Shot Visual Tests - You Pick the Winner Same prompt. One attempt. No rescue round. I gave four AI models three visual builds: a premium product page, a playable browser game,... 4:53 PM · Aug 17, 2026 · 27 View 3 2 Post your reply
Reply Relevant people noclipepe @noclipepe Follow Loading the AI future… Testing frontier models, agents & experimental AI projects What’s happening What’s new Entertainment · Trending Hayden Trending Heroes, Kairi Rap · Trending Blueface Trending Chrisean Entertainment · Trending Remember the Titans Trending #Lanterns, Hal Jordan Entertainment · Trending Ice Princess Trending Michelle Trachtenberg Show more Terms · Privacy · Cookie · Accessibility · U.S. TIDA · Ad info · More © 2026 X Corp.
GPT-5.6 Sol
