Grok 4.7 · Community source · Personal experience
In the 7 comments within hours of the post, four gave subjective impressions of Grok 4.7: not as slow as 4.6, feeling like an opus5 that does not overthink as much, writing that seems better but is still being tested, and Devin's SWE 2.0 plus fusion api described as better. Nobody wrote down a task, a timing, or a score.
In the 7 comments within hours of the post, four gave subjective impressions of Grok 4.7: not as slow as 4.6, feeling like an opus5 that does not overthink as much, writing that seems better but is still being tested, and Devin's SWE 2.0 plus fusion api described as better. Nobody wrote down a task, a timing, or a score.
Tasks suitable for a judgment: Within hours of the post, how a few r/cursor users talked about Grok 4.7's speed, whether it overthinks, how the writing feels, and their stated preference relative to Devin.
Tasks unsuitable for extrapolation: Whether the code is correct, benchmark rank, price, plan usage, an official API bill, and any comparison that needs a fixed task and scoring rules.
Applicable model versions: Grok 4.7 in the post title and body. vandersky_ wrote only "4.6". kodka wrote "opus5". ImmediateAttention88 wrote Devin's SWE 2.0, fusion api, and grok 4.7.
Test environment or client: The post is in r/cursor. The comments do not name a Cursor plan, client version, or repository. ImmediateAttention88 wrote that they switched to Devin and are using both agentic IDEs at the same time.
Reasoning tiers and parameters: Not stated.
The post body is only one question, with no test plan, prompt, output, or timing. At collection, the page rendered 7 comments, matching the post's comment-count; the comment JSON on the same page is also these 7 comments, with no unloaded more node. The page includes Reddit's Chinese interface translations; the quotations below use the English original. The selected sort control was not recorded; the notes below follow the visible order at the time.
Four comments speak directly to how it feels to use:
vandersky_ (2026-09-21 18:58 UTC, element score 4) wrote: "Not as fucking slow as 4.6". There is no task, duration, or output length.
kodka (2026-09-21 20:59 UTC, score 3) wrote: "i love it so far, it really feels like opus5 that does not overthink stuff". There is no task sample.
explorioapp (2026-09-21 21:54 UTC, score 1) wrote: "So far, it seems like a better writer. I'm still testing". The comparison baseline is not stated, and they say they are still testing.
ImmediateAttention88 (2026-09-21 18:24 UTC, score -4) wrote that they switched to Devin and consider "SWE 2.0 with fusion api is better than grok 4.7". An edit adds that they are currently using both agentic IDEs. The dimension of "better" is not stated.
The other three do not amount to model experience. FinalAliens said there was no reset, so they could not test for long. GalaxyGuide echoed that there should be a reset. muecksimon replied to FinalAliens: "OpenAI ist auch nicht spacex".
Original title: "So whats youre initial experience on Grok 4.7?"
Original body: "So whats your initial experience on Grok 4.7?"
The flair is Question / Discussion. The post element's score attribute is 2. The comment action row does not draw the score as a visible number; scores come from the score attributes of shreddit-post and shreddit-comment on the page. In JSON taken later from the same page, the post score is 1, GalaxyGuide is 4, and the remaining comment scores match the element attributes.
Visible comments:
FinalAliens, 2026-09-21 18:36:27 UTC, score 12. Comment: "No reset, so I cannot test it for long time. OpenAI at least usually gives reset, when there is new model."
muecksimon, replying to the comment above, 2026-09-21 20:08:50 UTC, score 2. Comment: "OpenAI ist auch nicht spacex"
GalaxyGuide, 2026-09-21 18:57:12 UTC, element score 5 (JSON is 4). Comment: "They should def give a reset"
vandersky_, 2026-09-21 18:58:29 UTC, score 4. Comment: "Not as fucking slow as 4.6"
kodka, 2026-09-21 20:59:59 UTC, score 3. Comment: "i love it so far, it really feels like opus5 that does not overthink stuff"
explorioapp, 2026-09-21 21:54:43 UTC, score 1. Comment: "So far, it seems like a better writer. I'm still testing"
ImmediateAttention88, 2026-09-21 18:24:59 UTC, score -4. Comment: "I am so glad that i switched to devin. SWE 2.0 with fusion api is better than grok 4.7." The next sentence is "The only difficult choice was letting grok bot go..." The edit is "Edit: for now i am using both of this agentic ide".
What remains is verbal impressions from the hours after the post: someone finds it not as slow as 4.6, someone finds it like an opus5 that overthinks less, someone finds the writing seemingly better but still under test, and someone leans toward Devin's SWE 2.0 plus fusion api while still using two agentic IDEs. None of these sentences share a common task, sample size, timing, or scoring rules. The content type is therefore recorded as community-opinion.
FinalAliens and GalaxyGuide are talking about whether there is a usage reset after a new model. muecksimon's reply has nothing to do with Grok 4.7's capabilities. Reasoning tier, fast mode, Cursor plan, and a specific repository are all unstated. vandersky_'s "4.6" and kodka's "opus5" are not written out in full. The post score and GalaxyGuide's score differ by 1 between the element attributes and the JSON, so at collection time they cannot be collapsed into one exact popularity figure.
Opening the permalink above shows the body and the 7 comments present at collection. The page attaches Chinese translations to the English original; when checking, follow the English. Scores change. The post has no prompt and no output, so the speed, writing, and Devin comparisons cannot be rerun under the original conditions.
The figures, task set, reasoning tier, and client conditions apply only to the listed source and collection snapshot. Different versions, harnesses, or providers must not be compared directly; undisclosed parameters remain unknown.
For a reproduction, fix the model version, provider or client, reasoning tier, tools, task-set version, sample count, and collection date, and record failures, retries, and human corrections. Full steps are in the source notes below.
Reddit (r/cursor) · Dramatic-Secret-3734 (original post); comment authors are listed in Raw data · Original publication date 2026-09-21 · Site edit date 2026-09-22
Open original sourceGrok 4.7
Download the Tabbit client to check model access
