Tabbit
ResourcesBlogModels
Tabbit LogoTabbit

Tabbit — The AI Browser that Works for You

Topics

  • AI Browser Resources
  • Agentic Browser Resources
  • Browser Downloads and Install Guides
  • Browser Comparisons
  • AI Browser Alternatives
  • Browser Productivity Resources

Popular Guides

  • AI Browser
  • Agentic Browser Download
  • Best AI Browser 2026: Top 9 Tested & Ranked
  • AI Browser Download
  • Free AI Browser
  • Best AI Browser 2026
  • AI Browser Comparison 2026
  • AI Browser for Windows
  • AI Browser for Mac
  • Chrome Alternative 2026

Events

  • Tabbit Skill Competition
  • KPOP SBTI Fandom Personality Test
  • Tabbit Campus Creator Program
  • fifi's Picks: AI Skills for Research Papers
  • User Survey

About

  • Tabbit Blog
  • Press & Media
Review
MediaGemini 3.1 Pro

Artificial Analysis's Comprehensive 182-Model Benchmark and End-to-End Latency Evaluation of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Original source

Artificial Analysis

AuthorArtificial Analysis Research Team

Source date2026-02-19

Tabbit curation2026-08-20

Read original

One-sentence takeaway

Independent testing by Artificial Analysis shows that Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieves an Intelligence Index score of 48 (vs. a price-tier median of 35) with an output generation speed of 121.4 t/s (vs. a price-tier median of 76.2 t/s); however, driven by its extended reasoning chain, its time to first token (TTFT) reaches 32.45s, making it a classic reasoning model characterized by high intelligence, high throughput, and high upfront reasoning latency.

Test environment

  • Evaluation organization: Artificial Analysis independent benchmark platform.

  • Evaluation target: gemini-3.1-pro-preview (Google official first-party API endpoint).

  • Comparison baseline: 182 mainstream large language models within the same price tier (>$1.00/1M tokens).

  • Evaluation framework: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1 (aggregating 9 benchmarks: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, and AA-LCR).

  • Test configuration: Standardized on first-party API default parameters and reasoning settings, measuring end-to-end token consumption, output generation throughput, time to first token (TTFT), and API invocation costs.

Input/configuration

  • Input modalities: Text, image, audio, and video.

  • Output modality: Text.

  • Context window: 1,000,000 tokens (1M).

  • API pricing: $2.00 / 1M tokens for input, $12.00 / 1M tokens for output, with a 90% discount on context cache hits (Cache Hit: $0.20 / 1M tokens).

Results

Evaluation MetricGemini 3.1 Pro MeasuredPrice-Tier Median / RankKey Observations & Characteristics
Intelligence Index (Overall Intelligence)4835 (Rank #40 / 182)Significantly above the peer median, ranking in the top tier
Output Speed (Generation Throughput)121.4 t/s76.2 t/s (Rank #35 / 182)Extremely fast decoding generation, well-suited for batch throughput
Time to First Token (TTFT)32.45s2.79sIncludes deep "thinking" phase, resulting in longer upfront waiting time
Total Generated Tokens (Verbosity)56M72M (Rank #30 / 182)More concise with lower verbosity compared to peer reasoning models
Weighted Cost per Task$0.33Mid-to-high tierDriven by the $12/1M output pricing combined with multi-step reasoning
Total Evaluation Cost (Full Benchmark Suite)$811.90-Standard full evaluation cost covering all 9 sub-benchmarks

Conclusion

In independent controlled benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview demonstrates a standout profile of "high-speed decoding + concise output" (121.4 t/s, with significantly fewer generated tokens than the peer median), making it well-suited for long-document reasoning and high-throughput analytical workloads. However, its 32.45s TTFT makes it unsuitable for low-latency real-time conversational applications or interactive UIs that require sub-second initial responses.

Limitations

  • Testing is based on preview snapshots from the official Google API; performance in production environments may experience fluctuations due to server load variance.

  • The Intelligence Index does not isolate or break down the marginal performance-latency tradeoffs of different thinking_level configurations (low/medium/high) across individual academic sub-benchmarks.

  • Evaluations were conducted exclusively via the first-party API, without accounting for routing overhead introduced by third-party distribution platforms (e.g., OpenRouter, Vertex AI proxies).

Reproduction steps

  1. Access the Google GenAI API and specify gemini-3.1-pro-preview as the model.

  2. Execute the evaluation scripts for the 9 open-source or controlled sub-datasets corresponding to the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1.

  3. Enable streaming to record the duration from request dispatch to receipt of the first answer token (TTFT) and the subsequent token generation throughput (tokens per second).

  4. Aggregate input and output token counts, and calculate actual per-task costs based on official API pricing.

Curated by Tabbit

This is a third-party source navigator. Model versions, test environments, and personal experience vary; consult the original source.

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Use and compare models in Tabbit

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Related reviews

OfficialGoogle Blog / Gemini models2026-02-19

Google Officially Releases Gemini 3.1 Pro: ARC-AGI-2 and Product Positioning Baseline

MediaLayerLens / Stratix2026-02-19

LayerLens Stratix's Six-Benchmark Evaluation of Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

CommunityReddit / r/LocalLLM2026-02-19

Reddit Discussion of Gemini 3.1 Pro's Static Benchmarks and Arena Deployment Choices

MediaMindStudio Blog2026-03-15

MindStudio's Full-Task Evaluation of Three Flagships: GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Related prompts

OfficialGoogle AI for Developers / Gemini 3 Developer Guide2026-08-04

Gemini 3.1 Pro: Concise Prompting and Long-Context Question Placement

OfficialGoogle AI for Developers / Gemini 3 Developer Guide and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview model page2026-02

Gemini 3.1 Pro Thinking Levels, Structured Outputs, and Tool Configuration

OfficialGoogle AI Developers Forum2026-04-07

Spec-Driven Coding Workflow: Claude-Led Planning and Gemini-Isolated Execution

CommunityReddit / r/googleantigravity2026-05-15

Gemini 3.1 Pro: Open-Source Architecture Alignment and Multi-Model Pair Programming Workflow