DeepSeek V4 Flash · Community source · Personal experience
A user reports that changing 10 lines consumed 28% of quota after the increase, and a commit message raised it to 32%; no token ledger is supplied.
Unverified: the original source could not be rechecked. Historical figures below are not current verified results.
Quota consumption after the price increase:
"After the latest price increase, I changed only 10 lines of code, and somehow used 28% of my quota. Then I wrote a… This is a necessary excerpt; read the original source for full context.
Reflects the gap some users feel in quota usage and billing after the DeepSeek V4 Flash price increase
The post prompted discussion about value for money after the price increase (the model is consumed quickly in subscriptions such as OpenCode Go)
Represents a category of "negative feedback after the price increase" from the community, providing a contrast with the prevailing positive reviews
The figures, task set, reasoning tier, and client conditions apply only to the listed source and collection snapshot. Different versions, harnesses, or providers must not be compared directly; undisclosed parameters remain unknown.
For a reproduction, fix the model version, provider or client, reasoning tier, tools, task-set version, sample count, and collection date, and record failures, retries, and human corrections. Full steps are in the source notes below.
Reddit r/opencodeCLI · u/blackburn1911 · Original publication date Unknown · Site edit date 2026-09-20
Open original sourceDeepSeek V4 Flash
Download the Tabbit client to check model access
