Tabbit
ResourcesBlogModels
Tabbit LogoTabbit

Tabbit — The AI Browser that Works for You

Topics

  • AI Browser Resources
  • Agentic Browser Resources
  • Browser Downloads and Install Guides
  • Browser Comparisons
  • AI Browser Alternatives
  • Browser Productivity Resources

Popular Guides

  • AI Browser
  • Agentic Browser Download
  • Best AI Browser 2026: Top 9 Tested & Ranked
  • AI Browser Download
  • Free AI Browser
  • Best AI Browser 2026
  • AI Browser Comparison 2026
  • AI Browser for Windows
  • AI Browser for Mac
  • Chrome Alternative 2026

Events

  • Tabbit Skill Competition
  • KPOP SBTI Fandom Personality Test
  • Tabbit Campus Creator Program
  • fifi's Picks: AI Skills for Research Papers
  • User Survey

About

  • Tabbit Blog
  • Press & Media
Review
MediaClaude Sonnet 4.6

Artificial Analysis: Sonnet 4.6 Non-Reasoning Intelligence Index 37

Original source

Artificial Analysis

AuthorArtificial Analysis

Tabbit curation2026-08-20

Read original

One-sentence takeaway

Artificial Analysis places Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) among comparable non-reasoning models at Intelligence Index 37, approximately 46 tok/s, input $3 / output $15 per million tokens, with a stated 1M context; the page also notes this model is deprecated, and the intelligence score no longer represents the latest Sonnet.

Test environment

  • Display configuration: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Non-reasoning, Effort high.

  • Index version: Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1.1, including GDPval-AA v2, τ³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR.

  • Comparison pool: The page states non-reasoning models are compared only against other non-reasoning models; pricing tiers are compared against proprietary models in the same category with >$1/1M blended.

  • Maintenance status: This model is deprecated. Only continues default 10k input token load performance benchmarks; results for other loads are historical values. Suggests considering Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning).

Inputs/configuration

The page shows the non-reasoning + high effort variant, not the reasoning variant. Input modalities text+image, output text, context 1M. Specific per-benchmark prompts and harness are in AA's Intelligence Index methodology, not fully expanded on this model page.

Results data

Model summary at collection time:

MetricPage value
Intelligence Index37 (category #5 / 63; category median 23)
Speed46.1 output tok/s (category #36 / 63; page says notably slow)
Input price$3.00 / million tokens
Output price$15.00 / million tokens
Cache discount90%
Cost per Intelligence Index taskN/A
VerbosityN/A
Context1M tokens

Same-page Intelligence comparison bar (excerpt, higher is better): Claude Opus 5 (max) 63, Claude Fable 5 62, GPT-5.6 Sol (max) 61, …, Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Non-reasoning) 37. In the speed comparison, Sonnet 4.6 is 46 tok/s, slower than most listed comparison models.

Page copy: Among the leading non-reasoning models on intelligence, but relatively expensive for same-price-tier non-reasoning models; supports text/image input.

Conclusion

By AA's methodology, Sonnet 4.6 non-reasoning high effort remains clearly stronger than the category median, but is no longer at the intelligence frontier as of 2026-08, and speed is also on the slow side. Suitable as a production reference point for "known unit price, 1M window, non-reasoning," but not suitable as a proxy for the latest Sonnet anymore. When reasoning variant scores are needed, open AA's reasoning page; do not substitute this page's 37-point score.

Limitations

  • Page explicitly deprecated; some workloads no longer updated.

  • This page is Non-reasoning High Effort, not interchangeable with official default effort or results with thinking enabled.

  • Cost per task and verbosity are N/A; cannot infer per-task dollars from this page.

  • Intelligence Index is a composite of 9 items; cannot be decomposed into SWE or OSWorld.

Reproduction steps

  1. Fix AA's v4.1.1 methodology, explicitly choosing whether to run non-reasoning or reasoning.

  2. Set claude-sonnet-4-6 with effort=high, disable reasoning.

  3. Record Index subscores, tok/s, latency, and actual $3/$15 billing separately.

  4. When comparing against Sonnet 5 non-reasoning, use AA's currently maintained pages, not this deprecated page's historical loads.

Curated by Tabbit

This is a third-party source navigator. Model versions, test environments, and personal experience vary; consult the original source.

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Use and compare models in Tabbit

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Related reviews

MediaAnthropic News / Introducing Sonnet 4.62026-02-17

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Official Release: Coding, Computer Use, and Agent Benchmarks

MediaBenchLM2026-08-17

BenchLM's Public Evidence Ledger for Claude Sonnet 4.6

MediaIDP Leaderboard

IDP Leaderboard: Sonnet 4.6 Matches Opus 4.6 on Real-World Document Understanding

MediaSansa Bench (trysansa.com)

Sansa Bench: Sonnet 4.6 High Reasoning Overall 0.733, Currently Ranked 4th

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Related prompts

MediaClaude Platform Docs / Prompting best practices

Clear Instructions, XML Context, and Self-Checking for Claude Sonnet 4.6

MediaClaude Platform Docs / Effort and Prompting best practices

Claude Sonnet 4.6: Effort and Tool-Triggering Configuration

MediaAnthropic Platform Docs / Computer Use API Reference2026-02-17

Claude Sonnet 4.6: Computer Use Tool Definitions and Automated Closed-Loop Workflow

MediaAnthropic Platform Docs / Context Management & Compaction2026-02-17

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 1M Long Context and Context Compaction Architecture Configuration